Thread (33 messages) 33 messages, 8 authors, 2010-10-29

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Large scancode handling

From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date: 2010-09-08 15:36:14
Also in: linux-media

On Wed, Sep 08, 2010 at 05:25:13PM +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
On Wed, 8 Sep 2010, Jarod Wilson wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
It'll conflict a little bith with the tivo slide patch I posted yesterday,
but mostly just minor context changes. I can redo that patch on top of
these changes if that's preferred.
I can handle those context changes when merging the patches at linux-next and
when merging upstream. We just need to sync in a way that Dmitry send his patch
series before mine when sending them to Linus, and I'll take care of fixing the
merge conflicts.
Ah, the specific conflicts I was referring here are confined to
drivers/hid/hid-input.c, and I sent the patch thinking it would go in via
the hid tree. It *is* for a remote, but its a pure HID device in this
case.
Umm, what patch are you talking about please? I don't seem to have 
anything from you in my queue.
Depending on the extent of the patch in question I could take it through
my tree as well to avoid too much interdependencies between trees at
merge window time...

-- 
Dmitry
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help