Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 5 authors, 2010-08-06

Re: Handling of large keycodes

From: David Härdeman <david@hardeman.nu>
Date: 2010-08-06 21:06:51
Also in: linux-media

On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 10:23:45AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
Em 31-07-2010 06:19, Dmitry Torokhov escreveu:
quoted
The usefulnes of reserved data elements in the structure is 
doubtful,
since we do not seem to require them being set to a particular value and
so we'll be unable to distinguish betwee legacy and newer users.
David proposed some parameters that we rejected on our discussions. As we
might need to add something similar, I decided to keep it on my approach,
since a set of reserved fields wouldn't hurt (and removing it on our discussions
would be easy), but I'm ok on removing them.
The parameters that we'll need for the ir subsystem can be implemented 
in a different way in the future (with no changes necessary to the input 
subsystem) so I'm also ok with removing them.


-- 
David Härdeman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help