Re: [PATCH 4/6] * Register platform interface
From: Greg KH <hidden>
Date: 2010-07-27 15:22:34
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 01:16:33AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 03:49:42PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:quoted
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 09:43:17AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:quoted
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 04:38:59PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:quoted
quoted
I am confused here... Are you having a separate SPI driver create a platform device and then you have mrstouch to bind to this intermediate platform device? Are you doing that so you can introduce I2C interface later? If so I think I prefer how adxl34x and ad7879 drivers are structured - they are split into core and interface parts but do not require extra devices/drivers (see in my 'next' brnach).There is no SPI interface to the device. It ended up in the kernel SPI because old versions of the device firmware listed it in the firmware tables as SPI and rather than doing the right thing (correcting the type) the x86 code created an SPI device for it. At a certain level it may be SPI, but it's all hidden behind the firmware on the SCU and nothing to do with Linux SPI at all.Ah, OK then. So, what is the plan of action? Greg, are you going to apply the patches to staging and move over to input or shoudl I do that (apply Alan's patches to staging _in my tree_ and move over to drivers.input)?I already have the driver in my staging-next tree, so I can apply these 6 patches as well, and then move it to the drivers/input subdirectory if you want. Or I can leave it all in drivers/staging/ and then after 2.6.36-rc1 comes, you can move the driver into drivers/input/ subdir.The 2nd one I think is the best.
Great. I'll queue up these patches then. Alan, when 2.6.36-rc1 is out, ask Dmitry to move the driver into the input subdir and all should be good. thanks, greg k-h