Re: [PATCH 02/03] input: bitmap update for sh_keysc
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date: 2010-02-08 07:18:43
Also in:
linux-sh
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date: 2010-02-08 07:18:43
Also in:
linux-sh
Hi Magnus, On Mon, Feb 08, 2010 at 03:32:34PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
+#define WRAP(fn, m...) bitmap_##fn(m, SH_KEYSC_MAXKEYS) +#define sh_keysc_map_zero(m) WRAP(zero, (m)->b) +#define sh_keysc_map_fill(m) WRAP(fill, (m)->b) +#define sh_keysc_map_and(m, m2) WRAP(and, (m)->b, (m)->b, (m2)->b) +#define sh_keysc_map_or(m, m2) WRAP(or, (m)->b, (m)->b, (m2)->b) +#define sh_keysc_map_complement(m) WRAP(complement, (m)->b, (m)->b) +#define sh_keysc_map_set(m, n) set_bit((n), (m)->b) +#define sh_keysc_map_clear(m, n) clear_bit((n), (m)->b) +#define sh_keysc_map_test(m, n) test_bit((n), (m)->b) +
Why do you need these wrappers? For me they simply create a distraction, later when I read the code I will have to go and look up what sh_keysc_map_set() means but if I see __set_bit() I'd know right away. Thanks. -- Dmitry