On Fri, 29 Jan 2010, Bastien Nocera wrote:

quoted

Having separate methods for feature and output reports should be 
sufficient and general enough, right?

Most likely, yes. Feature is enough for the 2 devices I provided patches
for. Could you please comment on what you'd like the implementation of
this to look like? 

I think that we should probably introduce flag parameter into 
hid_output_raw_report(), which would indicate whether OUTPUT or FEATURE 
report should be sent.

This makes sense both for Bluetooth and HID.

I will send out patches later today for you guys to test (and for Marcel 
to Ack the Bluetooth part).

This simple bug fix is turning into a lot more to-and-fro than I would 
have anticipated.

It's nice example of evolution, isn't it? :)

Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs, Novell Inc.