Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?
From: Pavel Machek <hidden>
Date: 2009-12-15 19:59:14
Also in:
linux-media, lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2009-12-15 · Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? · Pavel Machek <hidden>
- 2009-12-13 · Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? · Pavel Machek <hidden>
- 2009-12-13 · Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? · <hidden>
- 2009-12-08 · Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? · Christoph Bartelmus <hidden>
- 2009-12-08 · Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? · Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Hi!
(11) if none is against renaming IR as RC, I'll do it on a next patch;
Call it irc -- infrared remote control. Bluetooth remote controls will have very different characteristics. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html