Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?
From: Ray Lee <hidden>
Date: 2009-11-30 02:15:27
Also in:
linux-media, lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2010-04-10 · Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? · Mauro Carvalho Chehab <hidden>
- 2010-04-10 · Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? · hermann pitton <hidden>
- 2010-04-10 · Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? · Jon Smirl <hidden>
- 2010-04-09 · Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? · Mauro Carvalho Chehab <hidden>
- 2010-04-09 · Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? · Andy Walls <hidden>
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 3:35 PM, Andy Walls [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
If decoding can *only* be sanely handled in user-space, that's one thing. If it can be handled in kernel, then that would be better.Why does the address space in which decoding is performed make the decoding process better or worse? The in kernel infrastructre and restrictions add constraints to a decoding implementation. Userspace is much more flexible.
In which case I look forward to seeing your patches to move drivers/hid/ to userspace. Please cc: me so I can enjoy the ensuing festival. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html