Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system?
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Date: 2009-11-28 17:40:29
Also in:
linux-media, lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2010-04-10 · Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? · Mauro Carvalho Chehab <hidden>
- 2010-04-10 · Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? · hermann pitton <hidden>
- 2010-04-10 · Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? · Jon Smirl <hidden>
- 2010-04-09 · Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? · Mauro Carvalho Chehab <hidden>
- 2010-04-09 · Re: [RFC] What are the goals for the architecture of an in-kernel IR system? · Andy Walls <hidden>
Jon Smirl [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
1. Merging the lirc drivers. The only stable thing needed is lirc interface.Doing that locks in a user space API that needs to be supported forever. We need to think this API through before locking it in.
Sure, that's why I wrote about the need for it to be "stable". -- Krzysztof Halasa -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html