Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Date: 2009-11-23 21:46:41
Also in:
linux-media, lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2009-12-13 · Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure · <hidden>
- 2009-12-09 · Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure · Mauro Carvalho Chehab <hidden>
- 2009-12-09 · Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure · Mauro Carvalho Chehab <hidden>
- 2009-12-09 · Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure · Mauro Carvalho Chehab <hidden>
- 2009-12-08 · Re: [RFC] Should we create a raw input interface for IR's ? - Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3 v2] lirc core device driver infrastructure · Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
lirc@bartelmus.de (Christoph Bartelmus) writes:
quoted
I think we shouldn't at this time worry about IR transmitters.Sorry, but I have to disagree strongly. Any interface without transmitter support would be absolutely unacceptable for many LIRC users, including myself.
I don't say don't use a transmitter. I say the transmitter is not an input device, they are completely independent functions. I can't see any reason to try and fit both in the same interface - can you? -- Krzysztof Halasa