Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:

Hello Henrik,

On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 13:39 +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote:

quoted

Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:

quoted

On Sun, 2009-09-13 at 01:24 +0200, Henrik Rydberg wrote:

quoted

Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:

quoted

raw_w, raw_x and raw_y is used uninitialized for !raw_n

Thanks for the heads up, but actually not, since !raw_n also implies
!(ptest > PRESSURE_LOW).

Then can we move 'if (ptest > PRESSURE_LOW && origin)' stuff to 'if
(raw_n)'. If not then my patch is correct.

Yes, that's it, thanks. So this patch ought to solve the warning cleanly:

hmm, even then there is room for improvement and save some cpu cycles :

Thanks, ill keep this one in reserve.

Henrik