Re: [RFC] Infrared Keycode standardization
From: Trent Piepho <hidden>
Date: 2009-08-27 18:28:58
Also in:
linux-media
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, Devin Heitmueller wrote:
The biggest challenge with that approach is that lirc is still maintained out-of-kernel, and the inputdev solution does not require lirc at all (which is good for inexperienced end users who want their product to "just work").
If distros started packing lirc as a basic system daemon things would generally just work too. After all, there is plenty of other user space software one needs to do anything.
The other big issue is that right now remotes get associated automaticallywith products as part of the device profile. While this has the disadvantage that there is not a uniform mechanism to specify a different remote than the one that ships with the product, it does have the advantage of the product working "out-of-the-box" with whatever remote it came with. It's a usability issue, but what I would consider a pretty important one.
lirc isn't limited to one remote at a time. You can have many different remotes supported at once. So it's not always necessary to know which remote you have before the remote will work.