Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 4/5] input: gpio-keys: switch to new dev_pm_ops
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <hidden>
Date: 2009-08-06 00:51:37
Also in:
lkml
On Thursday 06 August 2009, Daniel Mack wrote:
On Wed, Aug 05, 2009 at 10:15:52PM +0200, pHilipp Zabel wrote:quoted
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 8:29 PM, Daniel Mack[off-list ref] wrote:quoted
-static int gpio_keys_resume(struct platform_device *pdev) +static int gpio_keys_resume(struct device *dev) { - struct gpio_keys_platform_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data; + struct gpio_keys_platform_data *pdata = dev->platform_data; int i; - if (device_may_wakeup(&pdev->dev)) { + if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) { for (i = 0; i < pdata->nbuttons; i++) { struct gpio_keys_button *button = &pdata->buttons[i]; if (button->wakeup) {@@ -251,19 +251,27 @@ static int gpio_keys_resume(struct platform_device *pdev) return 0; } + +static struct dev_pm_ops gpio_keys_pm_ops = { + .suspend = gpio_keys_suspend, + .freeze = gpio_keys_suspend, + .resume = gpio_keys_resume, + .thaw = gpio_keys_resume,I'm not sure I understand hibernation correctly, but isn't .freeze/.thaw about saving state and halting/resuming the device operation only?
It is.
quoted
It seems to me that enabling system wakeup functionality should go into .poweroff. (See <linux/pm.h>)
That's correct. And .restore() plays the role of ".resume() from hibernation".
Frankly, I'm not sure either. But luckily, the linux-pm list is copied so someone can elborate on this :)
HTH Best, Rafael