On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:26:28 +0530
Dipankar Sarma [off-list ref] wrote:

On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 09:58:12PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:

quoted

Hi,

the input layer does a "synchronize_rcu()" after a
list_add_tail_rcu(), which is costing me 1 second of boot time.....
And based on my understanding of the RCU concept, you only need to
synchronize on delete, not on addition... so I think the
synchronize is entirely redundant here...

The more appropriate question is - why is synchronize_rcu() taking
1 second ? Any idea what the other CPUs are doing at the time
of calling synchronize_rcu() ?

one cpu is doing a lot of i2c traffic which is a bunch of udelay()s
in loops.. then it does quite a bit of uncached memory access, and
the lot takes quite while.

What driver is this ? How early
in the boot is this happening ? 

during kernel boot.

I suppose my question is also more generic.. why synchronize when it's
not needed? At least based on my understanding of RCU (but you're the
expert), you don't need to synchronize for an add, only between a
delete and a (k)free.....



-- 
Arjan van de Ven 	Intel Open Source Technology Centre
For development, discussion and tips for power savings, 
visit http://www.lesswatts.org