Re: INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date: 2008-08-08 12:44:53
Also in:
lkml
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 12:49:49PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 23:04 -0400, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:quoted
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 02:57:39PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:quoted
(cc linux-input) On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:41:25 +0200 "Zdenek Kabelac" [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Hi During mouse unplugging from psaux connector from the laptops' docking station I've got attached INFO trace. (laptops still has synaptics device)Dell?quoted
quoted
Also for unknown reason to me psaux mouse & synaptic device do not work somehow together - is it hw limitation of /dev/input/mice interface? (USB mouse and synaptics do work quite well together) [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 2.6.27-rc1 #48(it's 2.6.27-rc1)Peter, here is the trace we talked about long time ago. For some reason lockdep annotation only works once. If reconnect is forced or psmouse module is reloaded lockdep starts complaining about passthrough port.Bit puzzling - and I don't have any ps2 hardware around to test with (nor do I normally use modules - but that is fixable of course). Does Rabin's patch help? http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/8/7/329
I doubt it resolves problem fully because it only takes care of module unload. I can easily trip lockdep by reconnecting the device. Just to give some more details about the problem: - synaptics touchpads have a pass-through port that allows to connect either external mouse or maybe a trackpoint device. Both devices are represented by 'serio' structures and are handled by the same driver (psmouse). - as far as I know we have proper locking there and lockdep annotatinos were added to lockdep to reflect the nesting of the serio ports. - if child port (pass-through port) is destroyed and recreated (due to module unload, or because user requested reconnect through sysfs or system-initiated reconnect) lockdep starts complaining although the new child port should still have the same "depth" as the old one. Thanks! -- Dmitry