Re: [PATCH] powerpc: Xilinx: PS2: Added new XPS PS2 driver
flat view
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Date: 2008-06-30 18:10:29
Also in:
linuxppc-dev
Hi Grant, John, On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:16:28AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 07:24:48AM -0700, John Linn wrote:quoted
+config SERIO_XILINX_XPS_PS2 + tristate "Xilinx XPS PS/2 Controller Support" + help + This driver supports XPS PS/2 IP from Xilinx EDK. +Consider moving this block to somewhere in the middle of the file to reduce the possibility of merge conflicts.
I can take care of that, no worries.
quoted
+ * + * (c) 2005 MontaVista Software, Inc. + * (c) 2008 Xilinx Inc. + * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the + * Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your + * option) any later version. + * + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along + * with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc., + * 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.These two paragraphs are redundant. Being in the Linux source tree implies that it is GPL licensed. You can remove them.
I prefer having the statement in right in the code actually. While being the in kernel implies that the code is GPLv2 compatible it could be dual-licensed or GPLv2 only. This removes any doubt as to what license is used on this particular piece of code.
quoted
+ */ + + +#include <linux/module.h> +#include <linux/serio.h> +#include <linux/interrupt.h> +#include <linux/errno.h> +#include <linux/init.h> +#include <linux/list.h> +#include <asm/io.h> + +#ifdef CONFIG_OF /* For open firmware */ + #include <linux/of_device.h> + #include <linux/of_platform.h> +#endif /* CONFIG_OF */This is a given for mainline since arch/ppc will not exist in 2.6.27quoted
+ +#include "xilinx_ps2.h"This header can simple be rolled into this .c file because the driver no longer has multiple .c files.quoted
+#define DRIVER_DESCRIPTION "Xilinx XPS PS/2 driver" +#define XPS2_NAME_DESC "Xilinx XPS PS/2 Port #%d" +#define XPS2_PHYS_DESC "xilinxps2/serio%d"These strings are only used in 1 place each, no need to use a #definequoted
+ + +static DECLARE_MUTEX(cfg_sem);This mutex should be part of the driver private data structurequoted
+ +/*********************/ +/* Interrupt handler */ +/*********************/ +static irqreturn_t xps2_interrupt(int irq, void *dev_id) +{ + struct xps2data *drvdata = (struct xps2data *)dev_id; + u32 intr_sr; + u32 ier; + u8 c; + u8 retval; + + /* Get the PS/2 interrupts and clear them */ + intr_sr = in_be32(drvdata->base_address + XPS2_IPISR_OFFSET); + out_be32(drvdata->base_address + XPS2_IPISR_OFFSET, intr_sr); + + /* Check which interrupt is active */ + if (intr_sr & XPS2_IPIXR_RX_OVF) { + printk(KERN_ERR "%s: receive overrun error\n", + drvdata->serio.name); + } + + if (intr_sr & XPS2_IPIXR_RX_ERR) { + drvdata->dfl |= SERIO_PARITY; + } + + if (intr_sr & (XPS2_IPIXR_TX_NOACK | XPS2_IPIXR_WDT_TOUT)) { + drvdata->dfl |= SERIO_TIMEOUT; + } + + if (intr_sr & XPS2_IPIXR_RX_FULL) { + retval = xps2_recv(drvdata, &drvdata->rxb); + + /* Error, if 1 byte is not received */ + if (retval != 1) { + printk(KERN_ERR + "%s: wrong rcvd byte count (%d)\n", + drvdata->serio.name, retval);
Don't you want to bail out here? Otherwise you will feed garbage to serio_interrupt() I think.
quoted
+ } + c = drvdata->rxb; + serio_interrupt(&drvdata->serio, c, drvdata->dfl); + drvdata->dfl = 0; + } + + if (intr_sr & XPS2_IPIXR_TX_ACK) { + + /* Disable the TX interrupts after the transmission is + * complete */ + ier = in_be32(drvdata->base_address + XPS2_IPIER_OFFSET); + ier &= (~(XPS2_IPIXR_TX_ACK & XPS2_IPIXR_ALL )); + out_be32(drvdata->base_address + XPS2_IPIER_OFFSET, ier); + drvdata->dfl = 0; + } + + return IRQ_HANDLED; +} + +/*******************/ +/* serio callbacks */ +/*******************/ + +/* + * sxps2_write() sends a byte out through the PS/2 interface. + * + * The sole purpose of drvdata->tx_end is to prevent the driver + * from locking up in the do {} while; loop when nothing is connected + * to the given PS/2 port. That's why we do not try to recover + * from the transmission failure. + * drvdata->tx_end needs not to be initialized to some "far in the + * future" value, as the very first attempt to xps2_send() a byte + * is always successful, and drvdata->tx_end will be set to a proper + * value at that moment - before the 1st use in the comparison. + */Good comment block. nitpick: can you reformat the comment blocks to be in kerneldoc format? That will allow the automatic document generation tools to parse it. see: Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt
This is an internal function so its not going to be exposed in kerneldoc though.
quoted
+static int sxps2_write(struct serio *pserio, unsigned char c) +{ + struct xps2data *drvdata = pserio->port_data; + unsigned long flags; + int retval; + + do { + spin_lock_irqsave(&drvdata->lock, flags); + retval = xps2_send(drvdata, &c); + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->lock, flags); + + if (retval == 1) { + drvdata->tx_end = jiffies + HZ; + return 0; /* success */ + } + } while (!time_after(jiffies, drvdata->tx_end));
The logic escapes me... Let's say you send a byte and time when jiffies were 10000 and now it is time 20000 and we try to send another byte. Our first attempt fails and with time fence 11000 (HZ=1000) we bail out of sxps2_write() after the very first unsiccessful attempt. Is this what you intended?
quoted
+ + return 1; /* transmission is frozen */
It is better to return a negative on error, even if you don't report actual -EXXXX error code. -- Dmitry