Thread (129 messages) 129 messages, 41 authors, 2007-11-19

Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs

From: Mark Lord <hidden>
Date: 2007-11-13 18:18:58
Also in: alsa-devel, linux-ide, lkml, netdev

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 12:50:08PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
quoted
Ingo Molnar wrote:
quoted
for example git-bisect was godsent. I remember that years ago bisection of 
a bug was a very laborous task so that it was only used as a final, 
last-ditch approach for really nasty bugs. Today we can autonomouly bisect 
build bugs via a simple shell command around "git-bisect run", without any 
human interaction! This freed up testing resources 
..

It's only a godsend for the few people who happen to be kernel developers
It's also godsend for users who want a regression they observe fixed.

If you can tell which patch broke it you often turned a very hard to 
debug problem into a relatively easy fixable problem.
..

Oh yes, definitely.  When that use happens to be a kernel dev + git user,
it saves the *fool who broke it* a hell of a lot of time, because they can
slough it off onto the poor bloke who notices it.

Mind you, no arguing that this is effective when that poor bloke
has a day free to download the git-tree and build/reboot a dozen times.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help