Thread (4 messages) flat view 4 messages, 3 authors, 2007-08-31

Re: [PATCH] input: Silence 'unused variable' warning in iforce joystick driver

From: Satyam Sharma <hidden>
Date: 2007-08-30 22:44:53
Also in: lkml

Hi,


On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Jesper Juhl wrote:
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
In the iforce driver we currently get this warning

 drivers/input/joystick/iforce/iforce-packets.c: In function 'iforce_get_id_packet':
 drivers/input/joystick/iforce/iforce-packets.c:249: warning: unused variable 'status'

if CONFIG_JOYSTICK_IFORCE_USB is not defined.

The warning is easy to avoid by simply moving the variable inside 
the only case in the switch that actually use it.


Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <redacted>
---
diff --git a/drivers/input/joystick/iforce/iforce-packets.c b/drivers/input/joystick/iforce/iforce-packets.c
index 3154ccd..48d4a86 100644
--- a/drivers/input/joystick/iforce/iforce-packets.c
+++ b/drivers/input/joystick/iforce/iforce-packets.c
@@ -246,13 +246,12 @@ void iforce_process_packet(struct iforce *iforce, u16 cmd, unsigned char *data)
 
 int iforce_get_id_packet(struct iforce *iforce, char *packet)
 {
-	int status;
-
 	switch (iforce->bus) {
 
 	case IFORCE_USB:
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_JOYSTICK_IFORCE_USB
+		int status;
+
 		iforce->cr.bRequest = packet[0];
 		iforce->ctrl->dev = iforce->usbdev;
Hmm, would this not still give a warning when JOYSTICK_IFORCE_USB=y?
[ I didn't know mixing code and declarations (not at top of statement
  block) was accepted style in the kernel ... ]

IMHO either you should at least wrap that case inside a {} of its
own (so that the int status; is at top of a statement block), or else,
preferably, just add "__maybe_unused" to the first declaration that you
removed just now.


Satyam
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help