On Fri, Apr 13, 2007 at 08:40:18AM +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:

On Thu, 2007-04-12 at 14:25 -0700, Barton C Massey wrote:

quoted

quoted

I unfortunately don't have the hardware in question to test with. This X 
configuration is of course perfectly valid.

I copied it straight out of the manpage so I'd hope so :>

quoted

Give me a day or so to check all this out.  I don't think
looking at the X behavior is too useful: too many place that
the direction can be swapped.  Instead, look which way the
bits coming directly out of evdev point.

I can do that (early next week), but I don't have any other devices to
test with. Can provide a dump.

quoted

IIRC I set things
up so that positive X was the same as on other evdev
devices.  Is the supplied X config swapping the X axis with
this line?

  > >         Option      "evBits"            "+1-2"

No idea! I just copied it out of the manpage from evdev(4)

As the xf86-input-evdev maintainer, I can tell you quite firmly that the
answer is a solid no.

However I can also tell you that I may infact have the behavior
backwards in the driver. :)

Yell, scream, and shout if that's the case.

Zephaniah E. Hull.


-- 
	  1024D/E65A7801 Zephaniah E. Hull [off-list ref]
	   92ED 94E4 B1E6 3624 226D  5727 4453 008B E65A 7801
	    CCs of replies from mailing lists are requested.

If I have trouble installing Linux, something is wrong. Very wrong.
  -- Linus Torvalds on l-k.