On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 03:52:24 +0000
Joel Stanley [off-list ref] wrote:

On Sun, 5 Sept 2021 at 14:47, Jonathan Cameron [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Sun, 5 Sep 2021 15:33:39 +0100
Jonathan Cameron [off-list ref] wrote:
 

quoted

On Tue, 31 Aug 2021 15:14:47 +0800
Billy Tsai [off-list ref] wrote:
 

quoted

Keep the model data pointer to driver data for reducing the usage of
of_device_get_match_data().

Signed-off-by: Billy Tsai <redacted>  

This one starts to be impacted by the fix (as its in the context).
Rather than making a mess of things for linux-next etc I'll hold
off on these until that fix is upstream in a few weeks.

If I seem to have lost it (it's been known to happen :( ) then
feel free to poke me!  

Having taken another look at the rest of the series (and Philipp's review)
please do a v6 starting from this patch.  

I'd recommend against the practice of half applying a series. I have
just spent a good chunk of time looking at v6, and wondering why it
won't apply to any tags in Linus tree nor to next.

Hi Joel,

In this particular case it may been unwise, but in general it allows me to
handle a higher volume of patches than would otherwise be possible.
There are of course other approaches, but this one works well for me.
I did express to what tree and branch these were being applied
+ exposed for build tests.

(It was made worse by the branch you applied them to not being part of
linux-next.)

It will be shortly. That was just unfortunate timing because of the end of the
merge window and a some issues that 0-day found in other patches in the tree
that needed to be fixed up before making a mess in next.

Jonathan

Cheers,

Joel