Re: [PATCH] ata: pata_of_platform: Use of_irq_to_resource() to populate IRQ resource
From: Damien Le Moal <hidden>
Date: 2021-12-17 00:23:47
Also in:
lkml
On 12/17/21 09:12, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, ..) relies on static allocation of IRQ resources in DT core code, this causes an issue when using hierarchical interrupt domains using "interrupts" property in the node as this bypassed the hierarchical setup and messed up the
s/bypassed/bypasses s/messed/messes
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
irq chaining. In preparation for removal of static setup of IRQ resource from DT core code use of_irq_to_resource(). Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> --- Hi, Dropping usage of platform_get_resource() was agreed based on the discussion [0]. [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-renesas-soc/ patch/20211209001056.29774-1-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com/ Cheers, Prabhakar --- drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c b/drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c index 35aa158fc976..557f349eb533 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ #include <linux/kernel.h> #include <linux/module.h> #include <linux/of_address.h> +#include <linux/of_irq.h> #include <linux/platform_device.h> #include <linux/ata_platform.h> #include <linux/libata.h>@@ -25,11 +26,12 @@ static int pata_of_platform_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev) struct device_node *dn = ofdev->dev.of_node; struct resource io_res; struct resource ctl_res; - struct resource *irq_res; + struct resource irq_res; unsigned int reg_shift = 0; int pio_mode = 0; int pio_mask; bool use16bit; + int irq; ret = of_address_to_resource(dn, 0, &io_res); if (ret) {@@ -45,7 +47,9 @@ static int pata_of_platform_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev) return -EINVAL; } - irq_res = platform_get_resource(ofdev, IORESOURCE_IRQ, 0); + irq = of_irq_to_resource(dn, 0, &irq_res); + if (irq <= 0 && irq != -ENXIO) + return irq ? irq : -ENXIO;
Why are you making an exception for ENXIO ? I suspect this is to cover the case "there is no IRQ for this node", but then how does this differentiate from a real error case ?
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
of_property_read_u32(dn, "reg-shift", ®_shift);@@ -63,7 +67,8 @@ static int pata_of_platform_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev) pio_mask = 1 << pio_mode; pio_mask |= (1 << pio_mode) - 1; - return __pata_platform_probe(&ofdev->dev, &io_res, &ctl_res, irq_res, + return __pata_platform_probe(&ofdev->dev, &io_res, &ctl_res, + irq > 0 ? &irq_res : NULL, reg_shift, pio_mask, &pata_platform_sht, use16bit); }
-- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research