Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Use libata platform drivers to replace deprecated m68k IDE drivers

[PATCH v2 0/2] Use libata platform drivers to replace deprecated m68k IDE drivers · Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org> · 2021-06-08
[PATCH v2 1/2] m68k/mac: Replace macide driver with generic platform drivers · Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org> · 2021-06-08
Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] m68k/mac: Replace macide driver with generic platform drivers · Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> · 2021-06-09
[PATCH v2 2/2] m68k/q40: Replace q40ide driver with pata_falcon and falconide · Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org> · 2021-06-08
Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] m68k/q40: Replace q40ide driver with pata_falcon and falconide · Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> · 2021-06-09
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Use libata platform drivers to replace deprecated m68k IDE drivers · Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> · 2021-06-08
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Use libata platform drivers to replace deprecated m68k IDE drivers · Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> · 2021-06-08
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Use libata platform drivers to replace deprecated m68k IDE drivers · Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com> · 2021-06-08
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Use libata platform drivers to replace deprecated m68k IDE drivers · Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org> · 2021-06-09
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Use libata platform drivers to replace deprecated m68k IDE drivers · Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com> · 2021-06-09
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Use libata platform drivers to replace deprecated m68k IDE drivers · Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> · 2021-06-09
Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Use libata platform drivers to replace deprecated m68k IDE drivers · Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com> · 2021-06-09

From: Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2021-06-09 03:53:15
Also in: linux-m68k, lkml

On Wed, 9 Jun 2021, Michael Schmitz wrote:

please note that Finn's patch depends on one of mine currently under review.
Without that one, Q40 support may break in certain cases.

AFAIK, that's only true for a configuration that enables both CONFIG_Q40 
and CONFIG_ATARI. In my tests with stock v5.12, such a configuration 
presently doesn't work correctly on Atari.

This patch series doesn't make this issue any worse.

Besides, I think it is a non-issue because the problem is so rare that 
no-one noticed it before I did, and the workaround for CONFIG_Q40 users is 
trivial anyway (disable CONFIG_ATARI).

Is there really some benefit in holding up this patch series?

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help