Re: [RESEND PATCH v3 0/2] ata: ahci_brcm: Fix use of BCM7216 reset controller
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-01-14 20:47:46
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, lkml
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Date: 2021-01-14 20:47:46
Also in:
linux-arm-kernel, linux-pci, lkml
On 1/5/21 1:22 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
On 12/23/20 4:05 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:quoted
On 12/16/2020 1:41 PM, Jim Quinlan wrote:quoted
v3 -- discard commit from v2; instead rely on the new function reset_control_rearm provided in a recent commit [1] applied to reset/next. -- New commit to correct pcie-brcmstb.c usage of a reset controller to use reset/rearm verses deassert/assert. v2 -- refactor rescal-reset driver to implement assert/deassert rather than reset because the reset call only fires once per lifetime and we need to reset after every resume from S2 or S3. -- Split the use of "ahci" and "rescal" controllers in separate fields to keep things simple. v1 -- original [1] Applied commit "reset: make shared pulsed reset controls re-triggerable" found at git://git.pengutronix.de/git/pza/linux.git branch reset/shared-retriggerThe changes in that branch above have now landed in Linus' tree with: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=557acb3d2cd9c82de19f944f6cc967a347735385 It would be good if we could get both patches applied via the same tree or within the same cycle to avoid having either PCIe or SATA broken on these platforms.Ping? Can someone apply those patches if you are happy with them? Thank you.
Ping? Can we review and ideally also apply these patches? Thanks -- Florian