On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 5:17 PM, Ben Hutchings
[off-list ref] wrote:
On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 08:04 +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
quoted
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 7:03 AM, Douglas Gilbert [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On 2018-01-30 07:22 AM, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
[...]
quoted
quoted
quoted
[1:0:0:0] cd/dvd QEMU QEMU DVD-ROM 2.0. /dev/sr0 /dev/sg1
# readlink /sys/class/scsi_generic/sg0
../../devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.1/ata1/host0/target0:0:0/0:0:0:0/scsi_generic/sg0
# cat /sys/class/scsi_generic/sg0/device/vendor
ATA
^^^^^
That subsystem is the culprit IMO, most likely libata.
Until you can show this test failing on something other than an
ATA disk, then I will treat this issue as closed.
Hi Doug,
Why is bug in ATA not a bug? Is it long unused by everybody? I've got
it by running qemu with default flags...
If the bug is in libata then it's not on Doug to fix it since he's only
maintaining sg.
Then I think we need to CC ata maintainers rather than treat it as closed.
+Tejun, linux-ide@, you can see full thread here:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/syzkaller/9RNr9Gu0MyY