Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 3 authors, 2017-01-09

Re: [PATCH] libata-eh: Use switch() instead of sparse array for protocol strings

From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: 2017-01-09 17:32:12
Also in: lkml

Hello,

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 09:27:23AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 05:30:02PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
quoted
quoted
ata_force_param_buf is __initdata and shouldn't really matter.
It mainly matters because of e.g. bootloader limitations.
Do we need a full 4k for the force parameters?  What would a typical
command line for it look like?
Maybe a couple hundreds bytes at max, but it's a bit weird to restrict
this given that it is bss, not gigantic and __initdata.  What kind of
bootloader limitations are we talking about?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help