Re: [PATCH 1/3] ata: sata_dwc_460ex: use "dmas" DT property to find dma channel
From: Måns Rullgård <hidden>
Date: 2015-12-21 00:54:01
Also in:
lkml
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-01-22 · Re: [PATCH 1/3] ata: sata_dwc_460ex: use "dmas" DT property to find dma channel · Andy Shevchenko <hidden>
- 2016-01-22 · Re: [PATCH 1/3] ata: sata_dwc_460ex: use "dmas" DT property to find dma channel · Måns Rullgård <hidden>
- 2016-01-22 · Re: [PATCH 1/3] ata: sata_dwc_460ex: use "dmas" DT property to find dma channel · Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
- 2016-01-22 · Re: [PATCH 1/3] ata: sata_dwc_460ex: use "dmas" DT property to find dma channel · Måns Rullgård <hidden>
- 2016-01-22 · Re: [PATCH 1/3] ata: sata_dwc_460ex: use "dmas" DT property to find dma channel · Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Måns Rullgård [off-list ref] writes:
Andy Shevchenko [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Måns Rullgård [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Julian Margetson [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On 12/20/2015 1:11 PM, Måns Rullgård wrote:quoted
Julian Margetson [off-list ref] writes:quoted
quoted
[ 48.769671] ata3.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUEDWell, that didn't help. I still think it's part of the problem, but something else must be wrong as well. The various Master Select fields look like a good place to start.Master number (which is here would be either 1 or 0) should not affect as long as they are connected to the same AHB bus (I would be surprised if they are not).I think they are not. The relevant part of the block diagram for the 460EX looks something like this:
Oops, hit send by accident. More soon. -- Måns Rullgård