Re: [PATCH 3/3] block: Introduce blkdev_issue_zeroout_discard() function
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Date: 2014-11-07 15:42:24
Also in:
linux-fsdevel, linux-scsi
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2014-11-17 · Re: [PATCH 3/3] block: Introduce blkdev_issue_zeroout_discard() function · Darrick J. Wong <hidden>
- 2014-11-14 · Re: [PATCH 3/3] block: Introduce blkdev_issue_zeroout_discard() function · "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
- 2014-11-11 · Re: [PATCH 3/3] block: Introduce blkdev_issue_zeroout_discard() function · "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
- 2014-11-11 · Re: [PATCH 3/3] block: Introduce blkdev_issue_zeroout_discard() function · Darrick J. Wong <hidden>
- 2014-11-07 · Re: [PATCH 3/3] block: Introduce blkdev_issue_zeroout_discard() function · "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
"Christoph" == Christoph Hellwig [off-list ref] writes:
Christoph> I'm not a fan of adding another function here and would Christoph> prefer a flag, but it looks correct, That was my original approach too but I didn't want to stomp over all the existing callers. Although there only are few. Ted: Which would you prefer? -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering