[PATCH] libata: fix ata_dma_enabled · Aaron Lu <hidden> · 2012-12-03
Re: [PATCH] libata: fix ata_dma_enabled · Alan Cox <hidden> · 2012-12-03
Re: [PATCH] libata: fix ata_dma_enabled · Aaron Lu <hidden> · 2012-12-03
Re: [PATCH] libata: fix ata_dma_enabled · Alan Cox <hidden> · 2012-12-03
[PATCH] libata: set dma_mode to 0xff in reset · Aaron Lu <hidden> · 2012-12-03
Re: [PATCH] libata: set dma_mode to 0xff in reset · Alan Cox <hidden> · 2012-12-03
Re: [PATCH] libata: set dma_mode to 0xff in reset · Jeff Garzik <hidden> · 2012-12-03

Re: [PATCH] libata: fix ata_dma_enabled

From: Alan Cox <hidden>
Date: 2012-12-03 01:41:44

diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
index 9426423..d772d66 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c

@@ -2657,6 +2657,7 @@ int ata_eh_reset(struct ata_link *link, int classify,
 		 * bus as we may be talking too fast.
 		 */
 		dev->pio_mode = XFER_PIO_0;
+		dev->dma_mode = 0xff;
 
 		/* If the controller has a pio mode setup function
 		 * then use it to set the chipset to rights. Don't

So do you prefer this?

Yes - definitely. That is the intended behaviour.

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help