Re: [PATCH] sata_highbank: use ATA_BUSY
From: Jeff Garzik <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-21 19:44:01
On 11/21/2012 02:35 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello. On 11/01/2012 08:59 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:quoted
ahci_highbank_hardreset() uses bare number for the BSY bit of the ATA status register, despite it is #define'd in <linux/ata.h>quoted
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <redacted>quoted
--- The patch is atop of the 'upstream' branch of libata-dev.git...quoted
drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)quoted
Index: libata-dev/drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c ===================================================================--- libata-dev.orig/drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c +++ libata-dev/drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static int ahci_highbank_hardreset(struc /* clear D2H reception area to properly wait for D2H FIS */ ata_tf_init(link->device, &tf); - tf.command = 0x80; + tf.command = ATA_BUSY; ata_tf_to_fis(&tf, 0, 0, d2h_fis); do {Jeff, are you going to queue this one and earlier patches from me?
Yep, should be queued in next 24-48 hours with a bunch of other stuff. Wanted to get #upstream-fixes upstream and settled first. Jeff