Thread (4 messages) 4 messages, 3 authors, 2012-11-28

Re: [PATCH] sata_highbank: use ATA_BUSY

From: Jeff Garzik <hidden>
Date: 2012-11-21 19:44:01

On 11/21/2012 02:35 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
Hello.

On 11/01/2012 08:59 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
quoted
ahci_highbank_hardreset() uses bare number for the BSY bit of the ATA status
register, despite it is #define'd in <linux/ata.h>
quoted
Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <redacted>
quoted
---
The patch is atop of the 'upstream' branch of libata-dev.git...
quoted
  drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c |    2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
quoted
Index: libata-dev/drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c
===================================================================
--- libata-dev.orig/drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c
+++ libata-dev/drivers/ata/sata_highbank.c
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ static int ahci_highbank_hardreset(struc

  	/* clear D2H reception area to properly wait for D2H FIS */
  	ata_tf_init(link->device, &tf);
-	tf.command = 0x80;
+	tf.command = ATA_BUSY;
  	ata_tf_to_fis(&tf, 0, 0, d2h_fis);

  	do {
    Jeff, are you going to queue this one and earlier patches from me?
Yep, should be queued in next 24-48 hours with a bunch of other stuff.

Wanted to get #upstream-fixes upstream and settled first.

	Jeff



Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help