Hello, Brian.

On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 11:41:45PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:

quoted

If you have some time, it would be nice to introduce
ata_platform_remove_one().  There's no reason to have that implemented
separately in each driver.

OK, I think I have a pretty good set of patches. I have about 8
drivers switched over to a new ata_platform_remove_one(). Should I
submit it with my resend of this series?

I think both ways should be fine.

quoted

 It would also be nice to move
remove_one()'s to some higher level port_ops so that individual
drivers don't have to specify them explicitly.

Hmm, which port op would you recommend? host_stop()? Or a new remove_one() op?

Heh, that was me being confused.  Please disregard.  I for some reason
thought .remove is an ata operation.  :)

Thanks.

-- 
tejun