Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] ata_piix: unify code for programming PIO and MWDMA timings
From: Sergei Shtylyov <hidden>
Date: 2011-10-14 16:52:53
Also in:
lkml
Hello. On 10/14/2011 08:43 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
quoted
quoted
quoted
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz<bzolnier@gmail.com> Subject: [PATCH v2] ata_piix: unify code for programming PIO and MWDMA timings
quoted
quoted
quoted
Besides making things noticably simpler it results in ~2% decrease in the driver LOC count and also ~2% decrease in the driver binary size (as measured on x86-32).
quoted
quoted
quoted
Fix piix_set_piomode() documentation while at it.
quoted
quoted
quoted
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz<bzolnier@gmail.com>
quoted
quoted
I'm still inclined to NAK this patch.
quoted
quoted
quoted
--- v2: remove use_mwdma variable and fix comment style
quoted
quoted
quoted
earlier references: https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/8/99
quoted
quoted
quoted
drivers/ata/ata_piix.c | 111 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------------- 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
quoted
quoted
quoted
Index: b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c ===================================================================--- a/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c +++ b/drivers/ata/ata_piix.c
[...]
quoted
We still have following code at the end of piix_set_timings():
quoted
/* Ensure the UDMA bit is off - it will be turned back on if UDMA is selected */ if (ap->udma_mask) { pci_read_config_byte(dev, 0x48,&udma_enable); udma_enable&= ~(1<< (2 * ap->port_no + adev->devno)); pci_write_config_byte(dev, 0x48, udma_enable); }
quoted
so everything should be OK.
Ah, I should have looked... Didn't expect it to be there, and it in fact shouldn't be there, but now I'm OK with your patch. :-)
But I would have preferred the above code to be removed, of course.
WBR, Sergei