Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] ata: pata_at91.c bugfix for initial_timing initialisation
From: Igor Plyatov <hidden>
Date: 2011-03-28 16:32:01
Also in:
lkml
From: Igor Plyatov <hidden>
Date: 2011-03-28 16:32:01
Also in:
lkml
Hello Sergei!
Hello. Igor Plyatov wrote:quoted
The "struct ata_timing" must contain 10 members, but ".dmack_hold" member was forgotten for "initial_timing" initialisation. This patch fixes such a problem.quoted
Signed-off-by: Igor Plyatov <redacted> --- drivers/ata/pata_at91.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)quoted
diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c b/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c index 0da0dcc..0267d54 100644 --- a/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c +++ b/drivers/ata/pata_at91.c@@ -49,8 +49,18 @@ struct at91_ide_info { void __iomem *alt_addr; }; -static const struct ata_timing initial_timing = - {XFER_PIO_0, 70, 290, 240, 600, 165, 150, 600, 0}; +static const struct ata_timing initial_timing = { + .mode = XFER_PIO_0, + .setup = 70, + .act8b = 290, + .rec8b = 240, + .cyc8b = 600, + .active = 165, + .recover = 150, + .dmack_hold = 0, + .cycle = 600, + .udma = 0 +};There's no need to explicitly initialize to 0. MBR, Sergei
It's much better to explicitly initialise, then use old wrong code, where .dmack_hold member was equal to 600. Best regards! -- Igor Plyatov