Thread (27 messages) 27 messages, 6 authors, 2010-08-25

Re: [PATCH 2/5] virtio_blk: implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA support

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date: 2010-08-16 18:33:17
Also in: dm-devel, linux-fsdevel, linux-raid, linux-scsi, lkml

On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 06:52:00PM +0200, Tejun Heo wrote:
From: Tejun Heo <redacted>

Remove now unused REQ_HARDBARRIER support and implement REQ_FLUSH/FUA
support instead.  A new feature flag VIRTIO_BLK_F_FUA is added to
indicate the support for FUA.
I'm not sure it's worth it.  The pure REQ_FLUSH path works not and is
well tested with kvm/qemu.   We can still easily add a FUA bit, and
even a pre-flush bit if the protocol roundtrips matter in real life
benchmarking.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help