Thread (20 messages) 20 messages, 3 authors, 2009-08-07

Re: [patch 4/6] ide: allow ide_dev_read_id() to be called from the IRQ context

From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: 2009-08-07 17:46:59
Also in: lkml

On Friday 07 August 2009 19:36:10 David Miller wrote:
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:27:36 +0200
quoted
Are you trying to tell me that after 6 weeks there is still no public
tree to hold future IDE changes?

If this is indeed a case here I hope that it will get addressed ASAP.
IDE is deep maintainence, we shouldn't be doing lots of changes,
cleanups, and things of this nature.  So urgency and timeliness
is on a sincerely different scale for it.
Nobody is saying anything about cleanups and things of this nature..
On the other hand, if you've been looking, I've been applying
networking patches to net-2.6 and net-next-2.6 by the truckload
on a daily basis because it is in active development.
Excellence in one area doesn't magically translate to other areas,
especially when said area needs a completely different approach:

I've been looking and I've seen you pushing non-trivial IDE bug-fix
patches with almost no wider hardware coverage to upstream (i.e. one
of my own patches which has been _explicitly_ marked as needing more
linux-next exposure)..
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help