Re: [PATCH] ata: libata depends on HAS_DMA
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: 2009-05-13 08:55:28
Also in:
linux-m68k, lkml
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 10:51, Alan Cox [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
If it doesn't interfere with plain PIO mode, fine.I agree. There definitely needs to still be support for IDE ports that don't have DMA capability.There is - it's just if the platform doesn't implement the dma_* APIs you get a problem.
Note that there are other things missing on m68k and m32r, that's why
Al added the
| depends on !(M32R || M68K) || BROKEN
commit 9317fd4c60962d3a9423b5f9bb5d1b10cf8a0699
Author: Al Viro [off-list ref]
Date: Sun Sep 24 23:40:00 2006 +0100
[PATCH] libata won't build on m68k and m32r
no ioread*(), for one thing
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds