Thread (7 messages) 7 messages, 5 authors, 2009-01-28

Re: SSD data reliable vs. unreliable [Was: Re: Data Recovery from SSDs - Impact of trim?]

From: John Robinson <hidden>
Date: 2009-01-27 10:49:08
Also in: linux-raid

On 27/01/2009 05:16, Neil Brown wrote:
[...]
Probably the only practical data structure for this would be a bitmap
similar to the current write-intent bitmap.

Is it really worth supporting this in raid5?   Are the sorts of
devices that will benefit from 'discard' requests likely to be used
inside an md/raid5 array I wonder....
Assuming I've understood correctly, this usage map sounds to me like a 
useful thing to have for all RAIDs. When building the array in the first 
place, the initial sync is just writing a usage map saying it's all 
empty. Filesystem writes and discards update it appropriately. Then when 
we get failing sectors reported via e.g. SMART or a scrub operation we 
know whether they're on used or unused areas so whether it's worth 
attempting recovery.

Cheers,

John.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help