Re: [PATCHSET #upstream] libata: implement slave_link
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date: 2008-08-13 10:17:05
JosephChan@via.com.tw wrote:
Yes?
Heh... the ping was directed at Jeff. :-) -- tejun
- [PATCHSET #upstream] libata: implement slave_link · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2008-07-31
- [PATCH 3/5] libata: misc updates to prepare for slave link · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2008-07-31
- [PATCH 4/5] libata: implement slave_link · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2008-07-31
- [PATCH 1/5] libata: make SCR access ops per-link · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2008-07-31
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] libata: make SCR access ops per-link · Jeff Garzik <hidden> · 2008-09-29
- [PATCH 5/5] ata_piix: drop merged SCR access and use slave_link instead · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2008-07-31
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] ata_piix: drop merged SCR access and use slave_link instead · Jeff Garzik <hidden> · 2008-09-04
- Re: [PATCH 5/5] ata_piix: drop merged SCR access and use slave_link instead · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2008-09-04
- [PATCH 2/5] libata: reimplement link iterator · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2008-07-31
- Re: [PATCHSET #upstream] libata: implement slave_link · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2008-08-13
- RE: [PATCHSET #upstream] libata: implement slave_link · <hidden> · 2008-08-13
- Re: [PATCHSET #upstream] libata: implement slave_link · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2008-08-13
- Re: [PATCHSET #upstream] libata: implement slave_link · Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> · 2008-09-04