Re: [1/2] 2.6.22-rc6: known regressions v2

On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:10:49 -0400
Jeff Garzik [off-list ref] wrote:

Alan Cox wrote:

quoted

quoted

quoted

I'm not even sure this report is IT8212 related rather than just an IRQ
storm

Why does the driver report "irq 0"?

ata7: PATA max UDMA/133 cmd <blah> ctl <blah> bmdma <blah> irq 0  <====

Above that, the ACPI layer says it assigned IRQ 20

Because the libata core code in 2.6.22rc6 reports all the ports and IRQ
values wrongly ?

AFAIK that was fixed, for IRQ.  Please point out examples where it 
remains broken...

2.6.22-rc6 it is broken, for all the systems I've looked at, as are the
port numbers. Tejun posted fixes for the IRQ but they do not seem to have
been applied, or if they were it was post -rc6 to a git tree.

Alan