Thread (16 messages) 16 messages, 4 authors, 2007-02-23

Re: libata FUA revisited

From: Robert Hancock <hidden>
Date: 2007-02-21 14:07:11
Also in: lkml

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

Tejun Heo wrote:
quoted
Aside from the issue above, as I mentioned elsewhere, lots of NCQ drives
don't support non-NCQ FUA writes..
To me, using the NCQ FUA bit on such drives doesn't seem to be a good
idea.  Maybe I'm just too chicken but it's not like we can gain a lot
from doing FUA at this point.  Are there a lot of drives which support
NCQ but not FUA opcodes?
Well, it's hard to say whether "lots" have this issue, but the ones I 
have in my machine, Seagate 7200.7 NCQ 160GB (ST3160827AS) and 7200.10 
320GB (ST3320620AS), both support NCQ and don't support non-NCQ FUA, and 
those (especially the latter) seem to be very popular models.

Likely Seagate didn't implement that command since they figured nobody 
would use that if they had NCQ..

-- 
Robert Hancock      Saskatoon, SK, Canada
To email, remove "nospam" from hancockr@nospamshaw.ca
Home Page: http://www.roberthancock.com/
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help