Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
From: Jens Axboe <hidden>
Date: 2006-02-28 09:44:34
Also in:
lkml
On Mon, Feb 27 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:54:17AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:quoted
Adrian Bunk wrote:quoted
Subject : 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable (SATA) References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/20/159 Submitter : Mark Lord [off-list ref] Handled-By : Randy Dunlap [off-list ref] Status : one of Randy's patches seems to fix itThis is not a regression, libata suspend/resume has always been crappy. It's under active development (by Randy, among others) to fix this.It might have always been crappy, but it is a regression since according to the submitter it is working with 2.6.15.
It might have worked under lucky circumstances with an idle disk and a goat sacrifice, so I agree with Jeff that this is definitely not a regression. To my knowledge, Mark always used my libata suspend patch on earlier kernels so it's not even an apples-apples comparison. So please scratch that entry. -- Jens Axboe