Thread (13 messages) 13 messages, 11 authors, 2006-03-08

Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions

From: Jens Axboe <hidden>
Date: 2006-02-28 09:44:34
Also in: lkml

On Mon, Feb 27 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:54:17AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
quoted
Adrian Bunk wrote:
quoted
Subject    : 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable (SATA)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/20/159
Submitter  : Mark Lord [off-list ref]
Handled-By : Randy Dunlap [off-list ref]
Status     : one of Randy's patches seems to fix it

This is not a regression, libata suspend/resume has always been crappy. 
 It's under active development (by Randy, among others) to fix this.
It might have always been crappy, but it is a regression since
according to the submitter it is working with 2.6.15.
It might have worked under lucky circumstances with an idle disk and a
goat sacrifice, so I agree with Jeff that this is definitely not a
regression. To my knowledge, Mark always used my libata suspend patch on
earlier kernels so it's not even an apples-apples comparison.

So please scratch that entry.

-- 
Jens Axboe
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help