Re: [RFC PATCH 2.4] ata_piix on ich6r in RAID mode
From: Martins Krikis <hidden>
Date: 2005-01-29 02:55:18
Also in:
lkml
--- Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com> wrote:
Martins Krikis wrote:quoted
Without this patch, if the BIOS of an ICH6R box has IDE set to"RAID"quoted
mode then ata_piix will not find any SATA disks because itincorrectlyquoted
tries the legacy mode. With the patch all 4 SATA drives becomevisible.quoted
I don't think it would break any other vendor's SATA, but you canbequoted
the judge of that. If so, perhaps we can restrict the test somemorequoted
by checking vendor/device IDs.quoted
--- linux-2.4.29/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c 2005-01-2812:07:56.000000000 -0500quoted
+++ linux-2.4.29-iswraid/drivers/scsi/libata-core.c 2005-01-2812:14:43.000000000 -0500quoted
@@ -3605,6 +3605,9 @@ int ata_pci_init_one (struct pci_dev *pd legacy_mode = (1 << 3); } + if ((pdev->class >> 8) == PCI_CLASS_STORAGE_RAID) + legacy_mode = 0; + /* FIXME... */ if ((!legacy_mode) && (n_ports > 1)) { printk(KERN_ERR "ata: BUG: native mode, n_ports > 1\n");hmmmmmm. Maybe "!= PCI_CLASS_STORAGE_IDE" instead?
Yes, that's much better. No need to even read the programming IF byte unless the class code identifies it as an IDE controller.
Overall, however, I am worried about your report of the driver's behavior based on that BIOS's configuration. The driver follows the PCI IDE standard (previously SFF 8038i), where a register indicates whether its in legacy or native mode. As it see it, either a) the driver logic for reading that register is wrong, or b) BIOS incorrectly configuring the device, or c) that register is only applicable for PCI_CLASS_STORAGE_IDE devices. Comments either way?
I'd say "c". I don't have the spec, but my PCI course-book seems to imply so. I could send a new patch but I can't verify it just yet---the board decided to stop booting... Martins __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - Easier than ever with enhanced search. Learn more. http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250