Thread (14 messages) 14 messages, 5 authors, 2004-10-04

Re: libata badness

From: William Knop <hidden>
Date: 2004-10-04 16:24:53
Also in: linux-raid, lkml

Great. I'll give that a shot after I drive checker utility finishes.

However it seems like the kernel shouldn't be oopsing, panicking, or 
double faulting if the drive is questionable. It apparently blew away my 
root fs last time. A peripheral drive failure shouldn't cause such 
destruction across the system, no?

On Mon, 4 Oct 2004, Mark Lord wrote:
I have used Maxtor "SATA" drives that require
the O/S to do a "SET FEATURES :: UDMA_MODE" command
on them before they will operate reliably.
This despite the SATA spec stating clearly that
such a command should/will have no effect.

I suppose libata does this already, but just in case not..
Something simple to check up on.
-- 
Mark Lord
(hdparm keeper & the original "Linux IDE Guy")

William Knop wrote:
quoted
Ah, well all of them are Maxtor drives... One 6y250m0 and three 7y250m0 
drives. I'm using powermax on them right now. They all passed the quick 
test, and the full test results are forthcoming.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help