Thread (10 messages) 10 messages, 5 authors, 2004-04-01

Re: [PATCH] Bogus LBA48 drives

From: Andries Brouwer <hidden>
Date: 2004-03-31 18:34:27
Also in: lkml

Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
quoted
Apparently some IDE drives (e.g. a pile of 80 GB ST380020ACE drives I have
access to) advertise to support LBA48, but don't.
One problem with those drives is that the lba_capacity_2 field in their drive
identification is set to 0.

Andre Hedrick replies:
Actually this issue an errata correction in ATA-6 and changed in ATA-7.

48-bit command set support is different than capacity.

Hmm. I read in my copy of ATA7:

 6.16.55 Words (103:100): Maximum user LBA for 48-bit Address feature set
 Words (103:100) contain a value that is one greater than the maximum LBA
 in user accessable space when the 48-bit Addressing feature set is supported.
 The maximum value that shall be placed in this field is 0000FFFFFFFFFFFFh.
 Support of these words is mandatory if the 48-bit Address feature set is supported.

Do you read differently?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help