On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 09:51:10AM +0200, Jarkko Nikula wrote:

On 12/13/21 20:00, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

quoted

Use temporary variable for struct device to make code neater.

...

quoted

+	dev->suspended = true;
+	dev->disable(dev);

In my opinion this brings more mess than removes. If I see dev->something
I'll immediatelly think "struct device" and get confused. x_dev->something
or dev_y->something not so much. And this change adds in my opinion more
confusion than removes.

Either way it will be inconsistent. If you wish to fix, I can build something
on top of your fix, but currently I drop this patch.

quoted

  	if (id->driver_data >= ARRAY_SIZE(dw_pci_controllers)) {
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s: invalid driver data %ld\n", __func__,
-			id->driver_data);
+		dev_err(d, "%s: invalid driver data %ld\n", __func__, id->driver_data);
  		return -EINVAL;

Honestly, what's is the value of this change?

What is the value of the changes in general? :-)

Yet another differently named
"device" pointer more to the mess (Inconsistent naming use of struct
dw_i2c_dev *dev, struct dw_i2c_dev *i_dev and struct device *dev in the
i2c-designware-*).

As I said, please fix this inconsistency yourself how you find it better
and I will use that in the future contributions.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko