Thread (11 messages) 11 messages, 3 authors, 2021-03-29

Re: [PATCH] i2c: add i2c bus driver for amd navi gpu

From: Goswami, Sanket <hidden>
Date: 2021-03-29 05:57:09
Also in: lkml

Hi Andy,

Thanks for the review.

On 26-Mar-21 16:10, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
[CAUTION: External Email]

On Fri, Mar 26, 2021 at 03:53:34PM +0530, Goswami, Sanket wrote:
quoted
On 25-Mar-21 22:35, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 10:26:55PM +0530, Goswami, Sanket wrote:
quoted
On 09-Mar-21 19:56, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 07:01:47PM +0530, Sanket Goswami wrote:
...
quoted
quoted
And I think I already have told you that I prefer to see rather MODEL_ quirk.
I did not find MODEL_ quirk reference in the PCI device tree, It is actually
used in platform device tree which is completely different from our PCI
based configuration, can you please provide some reference of MODEL_ quirk
which will be part of the PCI device tree?
I meant the name of new definition for quirk.
Can you please elaborate this? i am not able to comprehend.
...
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
Also why (1) and this can't be instantiated from ACPI / DT?
It is in line with the existing PCIe-based DesignWare driver,
A similar approach is used by the various vendors.
Here is no answer to the question. What prevents you to fix your ACPI tables or
DT?

We already got rid of FIFO hard coded values, timings are harder to achieve,
but we expect that new firmwares will provide values in the ACPI tables.
AMD NAVI GPU card is the PCI initiated driver, not ACPI initiated,
Which doesn't prevent to have an ACPI companion (via description in the
tables).
quoted
and also
It does not contain a corresponding ACPI match table.
Yes, that's what should be done in the firmware.
At least for the new version of firmware consider to add proper data into the
tables.
quoted
Moreover, AMD  NAVI GPU
based products are already in the commercial market hence going by this
approach will break the functionalities for the same.
This is quite bad and unfortunate. So, you have to elaborate this in the commit
message.
Sure, will take care of this as part of commit message of v3.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Thanks,
Sanket
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help