On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:59 PM Geert Uytterhoeven
[off-list ref] wrote:

Hi Wolfram,

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:33 PM Wolfram Sang
[off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 12:13:43PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:

quoted

Document the compatible value for the ROHM Semiconductor BR24G01 I2C bus
EEPROM.

What is the difference between those two? Could one also be the fallback
of the other (just in the highly unlikely case we need "generic" Rohm
handling somewhen)?

Good question.  The datasheets look similar.
Parametric search on rohm.com says the G-series differs in using
"Cu wire bonding".

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

I'm fine with the current form as it's simpler than using two
fallbacks. Do you want to submit another version anyway or can I pick
it up?

Bartosz