Re: [PATCH V8 1/1] i2c: i2c-qcom-geni: Add shutdown callback for i2c
From: Stephen Boyd <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-13 06:55:41
Also in:
linux-arm-msm, linux-media, lkml
Quoting Roja Rani Yarubandi (2021-01-08 07:05:45)
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c index 214b4c913a13..c3f584795911 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c@@ -375,6 +375,32 @@ static void geni_i2c_tx_msg_cleanup(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, } } +static void geni_i2c_stop_xfer(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c) +{ + int ret; + u32 geni_status; + struct i2c_msg *cur; + + /* Resume device, as runtime suspend can happen anytime during transfer */ + ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(gi2c->se.dev); + if (ret < 0) { + dev_err(gi2c->se.dev, "Failed to resume device: %d\n", ret); + return; + } + + geni_status = readl_relaxed(gi2c->se.base + SE_GENI_STATUS); + if (geni_status & M_GENI_CMD_ACTIVE) { + cur = gi2c->cur;
Why don't we need to hold the spinlock gi2c::lock here?
+ geni_i2c_abort_xfer(gi2c);
+ if (cur->flags & I2C_M_RD)
+ geni_i2c_rx_msg_cleanup(gi2c, cur);
+ else
+ geni_i2c_tx_msg_cleanup(gi2c, cur);
+ }
+
+ pm_runtime_put_sync_suspend(gi2c->se.dev);
+}
+
static int geni_i2c_rx_one_msg(struct geni_i2c_dev *gi2c, struct i2c_msg *msg,
u32 m_param)
{