Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 3 authors, 2021-01-06

Re: [PATCH] i2c: remove h from printk format specifier

From: Jean Delvare <hidden>
Date: 2021-01-06 14:44:25
Also in: lkml

Hi Tom, Wolfram,

On Tue, 5 Jan 2021 11:09:42 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 10:33:27AM -0800, trix@redhat.com wrote:
quoted
From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>

See Documentation/core-api/printk-formats.rst.
h should no longer be used in the format specifier for printk.

Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>  
Adding Jean to CC. Jean, I'd think %02x would be better, what do you
think?
Agreed, 0x%02x would be better.

If this is done then you can add:

Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <redacted>
quoted
---
 drivers/i2c/i2c-smbus.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-smbus.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-smbus.c
index d3d06e3b4f3b..5cd2cf84659e 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-smbus.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-smbus.c
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@ void i2c_register_spd(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
 
 		if (!IS_ERR(i2c_new_scanned_device(adap, &info, addr_list, NULL))) {
 			dev_info(&adap->dev,
-				 "Successfully instantiated SPD at 0x%hx\n",
+				 "Successfully instantiated SPD at 0x%x\n",
 				 addr_list[0]);
 			dimm_count--;
 		}
-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help