On Wed, Aug 16, 2017 at 10:16:59AM +0100, Colin King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King <redacted>
The structure cht_wc_i2c_adap_driver is local to the source
and does not need to be in global scope, so make it static.
Cleans up sparse warning:
symbol 'cht_wc_i2c_adap_driver' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <redacted>
CCing Hans to ask him if he maybe wants to create a MAINTAINERS entry
for this driver, so he'll get CCed for such patches? :)
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cht-wc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cht-wc.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cht-wc.c
index fe5caf70c7fe..01c94c918d4c 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cht-wc.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-cht-wc.c
@@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ static struct platform_device_id cht_wc_i2c_adap_id_table[] = {
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, cht_wc_i2c_adap_id_table);
-struct platform_driver cht_wc_i2c_adap_driver = {
+static struct platform_driver cht_wc_i2c_adap_driver = {
.probe = cht_wc_i2c_adap_i2c_probe,
.remove = cht_wc_i2c_adap_i2c_remove,
.driver = {--
2.11.0