On 2016-08-25 18:24, Wolfram Sang wrote:

On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 06:22:37PM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:

quoted

On 2016-08-25 18:19, Wolfram Sang wrote:

quoted

quoted

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c
index 3cb8af635db5..f052c3067791 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-pca9541.c

@@ -349,7 +349,8 @@ static int pca9541_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
 	force = 0;
 	if (pdata)
 		force = pdata->modes[0].adap_id;
-	muxc = i2c_mux_alloc(adap, &client->dev, 1, sizeof(*data), 0,
+	muxc = i2c_mux_alloc(adap, &client->dev, 1, sizeof(*data),
+			     I2C_MUX_ARBITRATOR,

Does it make sense to rename the file to i2c-arb-* somewhen then? Just
asking, I'll apply the patch anyhow.

There should be a clean branch with /only/ this series that both i2c and
iio can share, to prevent merge problems. I said I'd make such a branch
in the i2c-mux repo, but you are of course also welcome to provide that
branch if you prefer...

No, this is fine. Send me a pull request and I'll merge.

Right, I was waiting for some confirmation if v4.8-rc3 was a good base,
but I'm running out of patience...

Anyway, I'll send the pull request no later that tomorrow morning (CEST).

I assume I can add your ack?

Cheers,
Peter