Thread (3 messages) 3 messages, 3 authors, 2012-09-13

RE: i2c:clk: preparation for switch to common clock framework

From: Karicheri, Muralidharan <hidden>
Date: 2012-09-13 18:45:06
Also in: lkml

quoted
-----Original Message-----
From: Wolfram Sang [mailto:w.sang-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org]
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 5:30 AM
To: Karicheri, Muralidharan
Cc: Nori, Sekhar; Hilman, Kevin; khali-PUYAD+kWke1g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org; ben-linux-elnMNo+KYs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org; davinci-linux-
open-source-VycZQUHpC/PFrsHnngEfi1aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org; linux-i2c-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org; linux-
kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: i2c:clk: preparation for switch to common clock framework

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 06:10:36PM -0000, m-karicheri2-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org wrote:
quoted
As a first step towards migrating davinci platforms to use common
clock framework, replace all instances of clk_enable() with
clk_prepare_enable() and clk_disable() with clk_disable_unprepare().
Until the platform is switched to use the CONFIG_HAVE_CLK_PREPARE
Kconfig variable, this just adds a might_sleep() call and would work without any issues.

This will make it easy later to switch to common clk based
implementation of clk driver from DaVinci specific driver.

Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri <redacted>
Subject had "i2c:clk" where "i2c: davinci" would be more precise.

Fixed that and pushed to -next.

Thanks,

   Wolfram
Wolfram,

Thanks for pushing this to -next. Greatly appreciated.

Murali
quoted
--
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Wolfram Sang                |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help